Wednesday, May 13, 2009

300 Million Now

The U.S. has officially passed the 200 million mark in total population. It is not a good thing for us. In 1967, just 39 years ago our population was 200 million, a good number for a country this size. So why did it grow by 33% (100 million newcomers) in just 39 years. The answer is 'immigration'...or more specifically 'illegal immigration'.
Since this is congressional election time, the Bush administration practically ignored the 300 million milestone. Since the problem of illegal immigration has become a high profile issue in the U.S., Bush and the Republicans do not want to make a big deal of the population boom. They know their lack of interest in stopping illegal immigrants from pouring across our borders has upset many Americans who see the nation's culture, language, economy, and educational system assaulted by the illegals. A fact about the 100 million gain since 1967 is that 55% (or 55 million) of the new population is from immigration, and most of that illegal immigration from Mexico and other Hispanic nations.
Thus, our population would be about 245 million if immigration laws would have been enforced the past 39 years. Projections based on a continued open door policy about illegal immigration show that in 2043 the population in the U.S will be 400 million, with Hispanics becoming about half he total population of the U.S. The census bureau here says we have one illegal immigrant entering this country every 31 seconds! The vast majority are not the educated Hispanic population we want and need, but rather illiterate peasants, unemployed, criminals, drug deals and social misfits.
The great irony of Bush's phony war on terrorism is that there is little chance of Islamic militants injuring this country to any great degree, while the massive invasion from south of our border has already put the U.S. in economic, social, political. intellectual and cultural crisis. The Islamic terrorists should relax and just wait for this illegal assault to kill the U.S.. If nothing is done to change the flow it surely will happen soon enough.
How is a police chief supposed to know who the real criminals are? Take the case of two car thieves in One small Missouri county. Yesterday, Ballwin Police Chief James Biederman nabbed a criminal he would have preferred not catching. The son of Ballwin Police Chief James Biederman and a friend were arrested Sunday after police said the two took Biederman's unmarked police car, pretended to be police officers and began pulling over motorists on a local highway.
Now that's a real show and tell performance! Authorities said the 23-year-old man and an 18-year-old friend were using the car's siren and lights to pull over motorists and check their licenses. They both wore cargo pants and shirts with police logos. The chief's son even wore a gun belt with an air pistol that resembled a .40-caliber Glock, police said. But their fun ended when they pulled over an off-duty St. Charles County sheriff's detective. Sheriff Tom Neer said that after the detective identified himself, they told him they were on special assignment with the Ballwin police department.
As the detective checked their story with his supervisor, the two idiots ran back to their car and drove off. The detective checked the license plate and saw that it belonged to Chief Biederman, who lives nearby. The detective identified the two and when police went to the chief's address, where they were then arrested. They are expected to be charged with misdemeanor charges of impersonating a police officer ( and I hope also with being dangerously stupid). Police Chief Biederman said, "It is a family matter and we are dealing with it supporting our son. Unfortunately, he made a poor choice and will have to deal with the consequences of his actions." Neer said the two were lucky they didn't pull over anyone with outstanding felony warrants or another reason to escape police. "Every car an officer stops, he expects the worst and hopes for the best, " Neer said. "I don't think that went through these youngster's heads". No, Chief... I think it did pass right thought their heads.
It had too because evidently there aren't any brains in either head.

No comments:

Post a Comment