The world seems to be getting both more jealous and resentful
toward
millionaires as the numbers of them increase each year. Face it. Being
a millionaire is not such a big deal anymore. It's too common now.
Perhaps today's millionaire is yesterday's upper middle class. The
billionaire class is now the class to which the non billionaires
aspire. And this phenomenon of the very year growing in number while
the very poor also grows in inverse is accounted for by the changing
economy, the technological explosion, by governments shifting to less
regulated capitalism (especially in former communist nations, newly
morphed into capitalist dictatorships). I think it a normal evolution
and not a bad thing, for having more millionaires does not imply that
their creation was at the expense of the non millionaire classes.
Wealth usually comes from production, not from the hands of the poor.
According to a report by the Boston Consulting Group's Global Wealth
report the world added 2.6 million millionaire households last year,
showing that the rich are getting richer and far more numerous. It
defines millionaire household wealth as "invisible assets"—cash,
deposits and securities. That doesn't include assets like
real estate, business ownership, collectibles and luxury goods. The
total number of millionaire households in the world rose 19%
last year, to 16.3 million households. And no, China doesn't have the
most millionaires. The United States added the most millionaire
households and has the
highest total, with a gain of 1.1 million households last year. That
brings the total to 7.135 million, which is almost 45% of the world
total. China's millionaire population grew to 2.4 million last year
from
1.5 million in 2012. But Japan's millionaire population fell by 300,000
to 1.2 million last year, an indication of the decline an d fall of the
Japanese economy the past few years.
Qatar, which is awash in oil, had the highest density of millionaire. I
may move to Qatar because 175 out of every 1,000
households in Qatar are millionaires. Switzerland ranked second in
millionaire density at 127 per 1,000 households, followed by Singapore
with 100 for every 1,000 households. But both of those countries are so
dull I would prefer to live and be poor elsewhere. The U.S. also had
the most of something called the most centi-millionaires (those worth
$100
million or more), with 4,754 households. But Hong Kong had the highest
density of centi-millionaires, with 16.8 per 1,000 households.
We always hear how the world's population is becoming poorer, but the
report says that global financial wealth in the world rose 14.6% last
year, to $152
trillion—nearly double the rate of growth in 2012. Problem is, much of
that growth is in the hands of the small class of wealthy, not with
the common man and women. Yet, capitalism, which has spread to
countries once a in combat with it, tends to distribute wealth
unequally. The nature of capitalism is a survival of the fittest
concept, leaving quite a few "losers" mired in poverty,
Stocks were the biggest driver of global wealth last year, the
report said, with the total wealth held increasing by 28%. As we know,
the lower economic classes rarely can afford to or want to buy stocks.
With the rise in the millionaire class some politicians, as President
Obama does, will try to exploit the increase by demonizing "the
wealthy" in order to win votes in elections. In the U.S. President
Obama won election twice and has divided the population between haves
and have nots, largely by demonizing the wealthy, blaming them for the
nation's problems, and promising to take away some of their wealth and
redistribute it among "the poor". But most voters are sophisticated
enough to see the phoniness of that philosophy, and will ultimately
reject the rob from the rich to give to the poor theory. Thus, the
prospect for even more millionaires in the future is good. If you
become, you better beware, one we may be after your money soon..
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment