Another Labor Day has come and gone here, and Americans did
pretty much
what they do when with their work tasks when at work. They ignored it.
Outside of the constant whining by unskilled minimum wage workers who
keep asking the government to mandate a higher minimum wage, the labor
movement isn't very big or productive. I think if Labor Day were
abolished here few would notice or care. Give this country is a
capitalist democracy emphasizing equal opportunity over equal outcomes,
we don't have the social movements for "equality" that is found in many
other places. In truth, American workers do work hard on the job but
they are not happy about being there.
A recent Gallop poll of American workers looked at how Americans
function at work. Its conclusion was discouraging. Seventy percent of
the American workforce is going through the motions or, worse, is
actively disengaged and seeking to cause problems. No wonder that woman
at the Carl's Jr. hamburger restaurant keeps getting my burger order
wrong. Gallup doesn't blame the workers for their apathy. Instead, it
calls for companies to take steps to better connect with their
employees. I am not sure exactly what that means. In a free market
economy the only imperative for the employer is to make a profit.
Providing comfort for the worker isn't' a necessity. The fact that the
employee has a job and opportunity to prove him or her self should be
enough.
Regardless of the less than favorable economic conditions today, Gallup
said that worker happiness is most influenced by relationships on the
job and a variety of other intangibles. Hmmm Not pay. Among the
factors that influence worker satisfaction are "the opportunity to do
what I do best everyday" and working for a company with a mission or
purpose "that makes me feel my job is important." But someone who
works in a low skilled job that is filled with repetitive tasks has
little chance for that. Perhaps that kind of worker should be more
realistic and not expect such abstractions.
The No. 1 determinant of worker engagement, Gallup concluded, is the
way employees are treated by their bosses. Only the employers can make
employees happy and they try to do so as much as feasible because happy
workers tend to be more productive. But the cost of making workers
happy can sometimes be so big that profit is lost. As a result what
most employers do is to simply fire the employee who goofs off at work
or shows little interest in working hard. Seems reasonable to me.
Unfortunately the government today has sent a message to workers that
their employer must "take care of them", provide unrealistically high
wages and provide a fulfilling environment. Is that really the
responsibility of the employer? Should not the worker make his or her
own fulfillment? If a worker is dissatisfied with his or her job should
not the worker quit and upgrade the skill and education level to find a
more fulfilling job?
The worker might be better off if he or she make him or her self enjoy
coming to work. If not, they probably should work elsewhere. My Labor
Day dream is that workers here will stop asking their government to
force employers to "take care of them:, and instead decide they should
be personally responsible for their own work experience. Personal
responsibility is a quality being lost today. Sad, because nothing is
more satisfying or produces happiness more at or away from the job
site.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment