Its official now. The 2016 "List of Words Banished
from the Queen's
English for Mis-Use, Over-Use or General Uselessness", or words that
are annoying enough to banish, is out. That's right. Lake Superior
State University in Michigan has released its annual list of words and
phrases that it says should be banished this year. I think most of us
will cheer many of the selections. Few things are as annoying to people
theses days as the way communication technology creates a virus effect
on the language. When something is misused, it is now misused many
more times than before the pe communication tech revolution.
I suspect reality TV stars and other functional illiterates didn't make
many suggestions to Lake Superior for 2016. But the list itself is from
nominations people all over made to the school's site for banished
words. If you wish you can make a suggestion now for the 2017 edition.
"So", "problematic", "walk it back", "conversation", "secret sauce",
"vape" and "break the internet", are there ones on this year's list I
most applaud. If I ever use any of those here, shoot me and put me out
of my intellectual misery.
Lake Superior doesn't just ban the obviously overused, badly used or
annoying. It gives a reason for each. SO, here they are. (Don't shoot
me for the "so", it was intentional to show why it should be banned.) .
The word "so" as often used today serves no purpose in a sentence.
Currently, it is being overused as the first word in the answer to any
question or before one makes any statement. For instance, "How did you
learn to play the piano?" Answer: "So, my dad was in a classical music
club and I..."
As for problematic, it's a fancy way (too fancy) for saying "problem".
I guess "it's a problem" is too direct to say today. To impress others
we use "problematic" for anything that the speaker finds inconvenient
or undesirable, such as an opposing political belief or bad traffic.
We don't say "it's a problem" because it's really not a problem. to
exaggerate, substituting "problematic" is a way of making things that
are not a problem seem to be one. I suppose it is a subtle way for us
to exaggerate. Actual problems like a death in the family are equated
with imaginary "problematic" ones like whether seats at a concert we
wish to attend is sold out before we have bought our ticket.
"Walk it back,’ means to retract the statement, or explain it in detail
to the extent that the statement no longer has any validity or meaning
once it has been walked back. It's a way a politicians, for example,
can take back a miss statement or lie without appearing to be a liar or
imbecile. "I take it back" is too much an admission of fault for some.
Instead, they "walk it back" and appear to make lying less of a
transgression with that substitution.
SO, (Oops! I did it again.) that takes us to the banned word
"conversation", It seems everyone wants to have a "conversation" about
something. We used to merely ask to talk about it, but liberals in
particular now use "have a conversation" about an issue they believe in
as a code phrase that you must sit and listen to their belief and
accept whatever it is they hold to be true. Having a "conversation"
with a liberal, for example, about global warming, is admitting that
they are right that humans who heat their homes with fossil fuels will
destroy the planet in the next 30 days. When someone tells you that he
or she needs to "have a conversation" with you about something try to
run away as fast as you can. You can annoy them before running by
saying, "SO, I have to go now" as you bolt to escape them.
Blame Mc Donald's corporation for "secret sauce" having to be banned.
Formerly, "secret sauce" was used in a sentence to describe that gooey
mess that is served with Mc Donald's artificial chicken nuggets. But
mow it is said to explain the "secret" of something. Businesses now
release public statements about their newest products as being the
"secret sauce" for their success and the consumers satisfaction. As
punishment, those who release publicity statements about the latest
company "secret sauce" product should be forced to eat a double order
of Mc Donald's chicken nuggets with that gooey secret sauce on top.
"Vape" has been used recently as a new noun, referring to those
nicotine cigarettes that are supposed to be a substitute to the weapons
of death so many have been smoking for so long. First humans were
killed by cancer from cigarettes. Now they die from overuse of the
trendy word "vape". Here's clarity on "vape". If you smoke non nicotine
cigarettes you admit a vapor instead of smoke. There is no need to call
it "vaping". It's just as vulgar and harmful as those cigarettes you
used to inhale. Just call it smoking, since you also puff and die from
that kind of smoking.
The final entry on the 2016 list I most applaud is "break the
internet". It refers to any post or video that has so much Internet
traffic that it appears to some idiots that it will "break the
internet". I imagine a Kardashian saying, "I'm gonna break the internet
with my latest breast photo." "Break the internet" is now being used
for every headline and video on the internet. But as far as I can tell,
the internet was broken long ago. No need to break it again.
SO..... just shoot me now and put me put of my misery.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment