I went shopping to buy for a few toys to give as Christmas
presents to
a friend's 3 year old. It's been quite a few years since I looked at
toys for little ones, and I have a few observations about how toys (the
kind does reflect society) have changed or remained the same. First to
the similarity. Kid toys are still sold with an appeal to "education".
That is, the seller hopes mom and dad will think that when they buy
their toy it will turn junior into Einstein. That foolishness started
in the 70's and is still out of hand.
A small child under 3 years old needs play more than he or she needs
educational enrichment. That's because at that age it is through play
that kids best learn. Too, small ones are not ready to read or do math.
Any success they have at "learning" those skills is really a mirage. In
fact, they would be memorizing not learning, not having much
understanding or comprehension of what they "read" (pronouncing words
is not reading) or computed.
Another similarity between toys today and the past generation of toys
is how expensive that plastic is. I realize that selling toys is
dependent on time and appeal. Those toys that are trendy or fashionable
make big bucks for the maker. But those that are not often lose money
or break even for the manufacturer and seller. That Brabie-ization of
toys began last generation and is in full steam ahead mode. It's harder
to fin traditional toys today. Look for a simple doll house and it
might be impossible to find. instead, doll houses and other toys are
branded by what kids see visually, as in movies and TV shows. You'll
find plenty of Barbie doll houses, but then Barbie is for sale
everywhere.
That leads me to the biggest difference between last generation toys
for sub 3 year olds and today's selection . The majority of toys sold
now are branded to a character that kids love and know. It's wise to
have a Lil Pony doll house, for instance. That's because when a little
one sees the character image on the toy container at a store, that
child will scream fro mom to buy it. The same doll house without an
image of Lil Pony, Barbie, Ice Age characters etc. will get a zero
reception from a small child. It explains why there are hundreds of
Barbie dolls for sale, yet the dolls themselves are identical. Only the
clothes differ. Mom and dad see that and wonder why they have to buy an
entire more expensive doll each time Barbie changes clothes or identity
(maybe Barbie has multiple personalities?). But the child does not.
The other thing I noticed about today's toys that is different is how
so many more have computer chips embedded. A toy today must be
electronic to appeal to the little ones. This is great training for the
small one become the cell phone addicted , electronic moron that are
their parents and older siblings. Sadly, often kids don't play with
toys. Rather, they press buttons and watch the toys play themselves.
It's not a recipe for developing creativity but peer pressure says toys
have to be that way and mom and dad rarely fight the commandment.
I think the kinds of toys kids get from adults today are really the
images of the adults, not the desires of the children. If left alone
with an empty cardboard box that once housed a toy and a toy itself, a
child might benefit and enjoy far more the box.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment