Another act of what the media and politicians call
"terrorism" hit the charming, non political nation of Belgium the other
day. Those terrorists killings are infrequent and affect a small
number of people. Car accidents, for example, kill more people in one
day than all the acts of terrorism this century have killed. So why
does the media become hysterical and saturate us with the same
information, non stop in hysterical tone? It's because sensationalism
sells.
At first glance one might think the terrorists are paying for
advertisements to get out the news of their killings, for the mediums
behave as if the average person is really threatened by such deeds, and
because the mediums wholly exaggerate the damage done by them. The
blanket media coverage assured for any act of violence is reckless. The
media must ‘report,’ but does it need to promote the event by reveling
in the violence caused, as it manifestly has done to Islamic State
brutality? Of course not. Would not normal balance of importance be a
better policy when reporting such events?
The purpose of terrorism is not to destroy or kill. It is to pursue a
political cause through the massive publicity that is attached to
terrifying incidents. Modern society aid and abets this goal by acting
hysterically when a terrorist act occurs. No doubt the ignorance of
many today, those cell phones and other technologies are making us
stupid, about the most basic truths makes this possible. That's sad. So
20 people are killed in Brussels and the government there over reacts
by essentially shutting down the nation for "security reasons".
Instead of telling Belgians that the government is doing it's best to
protect citizens from all threats, it pretends it can stop crazies of
the ISIL ilk. This further promotes fear in the population, knowing
that such claims are a lie.
It would be preferable for people today to create real prospective
about those terrorist attacks, the first of which is that it is of very
little threat to most of us. Secondly, politicians should level with
their constituents and admit the histrionics around providing security
are a waste of time and money, that instead governments will do their
best to stop terrorism. Nothing more is possible. Thirdly, Paris got it
right w after their own terrorist killing event. Parisians said they
weren't bullied and quickly got Paris back to it's normal functioning.
Moving on quickly is always best in such instances. Fourth, citizens
should demand that the mediums knock it off. That is, report the story
once and move on. Embellishing what has happened and imagining more
grim events is a form of terrorism itself. The public would do better
to ignore medium over saturation and distortion of the terrorists bad
behavior.
It's unlikely any of this will happen, and the terrorists appreciate
the help they receive in promoting their insanity.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment