I may sound like a broken record but I have another airline
story to
write about today. The skies are getting more weird with every flight
and this incident is more odd than the one in which the passenger was
dragged off a United Airlines flight, blood dripping from his face,
because he refused to leave when the airline said it needed his seat
for airline personnel flying to work. This one can be called, the
incident that takes the cake!
A family heading to birthday celebrations in Las Vegas were kicked off
a Jet Blue flight after an argument over a birthday cake they had
brought onto the plane. Cameron Burke, his wife and two children were
in their seats at New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport.
Burke initially stored the cake in the overhead bin, but he said he
moved it down when asked to do so by a flight attendant. All flyers are
allowed to bring onboard one carry on and one personal item, including
cakes, within the size limits. Burke said he and his family were asked
to leave the plane after a second attendant told him off, and Burke
questioned whether the attendant had been drinking.
Telling the flight attendant she was drunk , even in jest, was not a
good move. But one wonders why the cake caused so much distress for the
flight crew. "She said I was being noncompliance," Burke said.. “I then remarked to her, ‘Miss, have you
been drinking?’ Because her behavior was irrational and she stormed
off." Hmmm The irrationality was just beginning because the crew called
police to arrest Burke. I guess there is a law about unauthorized cake
stowing in New York? Police acted irrationally too. They kicked
everybody off the plane (Maybe they were accessories to illegal cake
stowing?)
Jet Blue confirmed the incident but said the removal was justified
because the passengers' "behavior demonstrated a risk for additional
escalation in air." The airline also said that the Burke's cursed and
shouted at the crew and "refused to speak with a team leader about the
situation." There is yet no confirmation of that or that all parts of
the story told by Burke and the airline are correct. But the stupidity
of it all is astounding.
I wonder where common sense is in the skies today. It would have been
smart for the airline to not harass the Burke family about the cake,
and Burke should have complied to the airline request without smarmy
remarks. Burke sees dollars in his future, despite having his money
refunded after being kicked off. The rest of the passengers reboarded
the Cake plane (without cakes, I presume) and the Burkes were able to
take a flight from Newark to Las Vegas the following day, but Burke
claims he did nothing wrong and plans to sue Jet Blue with the help of
National Action Network, a not-for-profit civil rights organization.“ I
want the flight attendant fired, she has no business serving the
public,” Burke said. “I hope Jet Blue will retrain their staff and
recreate the culture I once loved.”
Culture he once loved?
Wow! Maybe someone should test Burke's sanity.
for claiming that kind of airline culture has ever existed.
Saturday, May 20, 2017
Wednesday, May 17, 2017
Pop Music Fizzles for me
I know I am out of touch with pop culture. My age insists it
is so, and
I am glad. I find most of it not only confusing and uninteresting but
crass, crude and lacking in substance. The worst of it for me is
popular music. I left the pop music audience many years ago. If I am
assaulted by pop music on the street, in an elevator or anywhere
outside my home, since I won't play it there, my reaction is usually
"that is awful noise". Gee, I wish they would bring back the Beatles.
A good example of a reason for my flight from modern music is the headline I saw at an online newspaper today. It said "Drake to headline....." The guy must be a singer because he had a microphone in his hand in the accompanying photo and it looked like he was crooning (we oldies call singing crooning because they used to do that in ancient times). Anyway, I am unfamiliar with Drake and a multitude of other pop singers today. The only thing that interests me about Drake is that he seems to have lost or forgotten his last name. Maybe he is one of those one name performers or maybe his mom told him to stop embarrassing her with his singing. "Don't use the family name, Drake"...or something.
There are a lot of one name singers I only know by their name because I don't listen to them sing. Maybe I would like them if I did, but I am uninterested in listening to anyone with less than to word in their name. Some of the one namers I have never heard sing, but know of the media swooning over them and speaking their one name are: Bork, 50 Cent (Huh?), Beck, Mario, Coolio (maybe his parents were drunk when they name him), Flea (I'd rather scratch than listen to him), Xzbit (how do you pronounce that one?) Nelly, Shakia and on and on.
There are some one names I know because they have been persistent in their careers. Beyonce' is a good example. I don't want to hear her sing after listening to a filth monologue that declared her hate for police, whites and anything not related to the "black experience'. It's odd how she and other black performers express so much hatred for other races and yet are popular with young people who are members of the races they hate. I once saw an interview with Beyonce' and was startled at how inarticulate and uneducated she sounded. yet she is a beacon of modern culture, someone who leads.
Music is supposed to reflect the culture and civilization from which it comes. God help us if that is so. No wonder it is often said that music should be listened to and not analyzed. Anyone my age trying to analyze modern pop music has my best wishes, but when they take rest breaks I recommend they spin a few Beatle records to bring back their sanity.
A good example of a reason for my flight from modern music is the headline I saw at an online newspaper today. It said "Drake to headline....." The guy must be a singer because he had a microphone in his hand in the accompanying photo and it looked like he was crooning (we oldies call singing crooning because they used to do that in ancient times). Anyway, I am unfamiliar with Drake and a multitude of other pop singers today. The only thing that interests me about Drake is that he seems to have lost or forgotten his last name. Maybe he is one of those one name performers or maybe his mom told him to stop embarrassing her with his singing. "Don't use the family name, Drake"...or something.
There are a lot of one name singers I only know by their name because I don't listen to them sing. Maybe I would like them if I did, but I am uninterested in listening to anyone with less than to word in their name. Some of the one namers I have never heard sing, but know of the media swooning over them and speaking their one name are: Bork, 50 Cent (Huh?), Beck, Mario, Coolio (maybe his parents were drunk when they name him), Flea (I'd rather scratch than listen to him), Xzbit (how do you pronounce that one?) Nelly, Shakia and on and on.
There are some one names I know because they have been persistent in their careers. Beyonce' is a good example. I don't want to hear her sing after listening to a filth monologue that declared her hate for police, whites and anything not related to the "black experience'. It's odd how she and other black performers express so much hatred for other races and yet are popular with young people who are members of the races they hate. I once saw an interview with Beyonce' and was startled at how inarticulate and uneducated she sounded. yet she is a beacon of modern culture, someone who leads.
Music is supposed to reflect the culture and civilization from which it comes. God help us if that is so. No wonder it is often said that music should be listened to and not analyzed. Anyone my age trying to analyze modern pop music has my best wishes, but when they take rest breaks I recommend they spin a few Beatle records to bring back their sanity.
Monday, May 8, 2017
The Diversity and Inclusion Hate Campaign
In reading the newspaper this morning I noted a big bold headline
about an MTV awards show that said, "MTV Awards celebrate inclusion and
diversity". I don't watch that TV channel and know or care nothing
about the people they honored at the ceremony. But I do know about the
idiotic "diversity and inclusion" policy of the left. The term demands
nothing short of complete uniformity in accepting radical, left-wing
ideas about multiculturalism, and despite the “inclusion” part, its
focus on forced levels of “diversity” inherently demands nothing short
of the exclusion and mistreatment of white people to do it. This is the
latest left wing bigotry campaign, cloaked in the lie that it promotes
fairness.
I suspect the political correctness that Obama and his minions promoted has run its course, given that people see it for what it is- hate and bigotry against whatever is the majority preference. To replace political correctness, this diversity/inclusion nonsense has slowly been inching its way to the top of the left list of how to discriminate in the name of fairness. It rules every American university with an iron hand, demonizing anything or anyone who is not a member of a minority group. Diversity and inclusion has even managed to infiltrate the once conservative corporate world with stunning effectiveness. The nation's leading financial institutions, from Goldman Sachs to JPMorgan Chase, have "diversity and inclusion offices" in order to avoid being targeted by the diversity crowd with the favorite brand of the left- "racism".
The media loves the diversity spiel and anyone who questions why someone is better or more deserving simply because his or her skin color is not white is the mantra that the media.It is becoming mainstream. The D and I campaign is really a rebranding of the stale and vacuous political correctness war we have suffered the past decade or so. Most institutions couldn't get away with having an official office of "political correctness," a direct and obvious assault on the principles of intellectual freedom and the free exchange of ideas. But few peole dare to challenge such a nice sounding religion as "diversity and inclusion". Few institutions will challenge the hate of D and I because it's not good business and they will be scorned publicly if they do.
The, "White people are oppressors and we must destroy them" campaign of diversity and inclusion advocates promotes an entitlement based on race that produces great tension among the demonized white person constituency it seeks to wipe out. It also marginalizes minorities who oppose it and want to be judged on merit, not skin color.
Here's what D and I really is. "Diversity" means the ideologically motivated desire to increase the number of minorities at a given institution by accepting, hiring and promoting based on race. White is evil and non white is Godly in the eyes of the diversity haters. And "inclusion" means ensuring that no white person is allowed to complain about it. I just did....so go ahead and attack me for preferring fairness, equality and ethical behavior toward all.
I suspect the political correctness that Obama and his minions promoted has run its course, given that people see it for what it is- hate and bigotry against whatever is the majority preference. To replace political correctness, this diversity/inclusion nonsense has slowly been inching its way to the top of the left list of how to discriminate in the name of fairness. It rules every American university with an iron hand, demonizing anything or anyone who is not a member of a minority group. Diversity and inclusion has even managed to infiltrate the once conservative corporate world with stunning effectiveness. The nation's leading financial institutions, from Goldman Sachs to JPMorgan Chase, have "diversity and inclusion offices" in order to avoid being targeted by the diversity crowd with the favorite brand of the left- "racism".
The media loves the diversity spiel and anyone who questions why someone is better or more deserving simply because his or her skin color is not white is the mantra that the media.It is becoming mainstream. The D and I campaign is really a rebranding of the stale and vacuous political correctness war we have suffered the past decade or so. Most institutions couldn't get away with having an official office of "political correctness," a direct and obvious assault on the principles of intellectual freedom and the free exchange of ideas. But few peole dare to challenge such a nice sounding religion as "diversity and inclusion". Few institutions will challenge the hate of D and I because it's not good business and they will be scorned publicly if they do.
The, "White people are oppressors and we must destroy them" campaign of diversity and inclusion advocates promotes an entitlement based on race that produces great tension among the demonized white person constituency it seeks to wipe out. It also marginalizes minorities who oppose it and want to be judged on merit, not skin color.
Here's what D and I really is. "Diversity" means the ideologically motivated desire to increase the number of minorities at a given institution by accepting, hiring and promoting based on race. White is evil and non white is Godly in the eyes of the diversity haters. And "inclusion" means ensuring that no white person is allowed to complain about it. I just did....so go ahead and attack me for preferring fairness, equality and ethical behavior toward all.
Tuesday, May 2, 2017
May Day Is Protest Day
Another May Day has passed. In most of the world May Day is a patriotic
display, the nation celebrates itself and there is unity. But in
Western Europe and the United States May Day was never a holiday of
celebration and unity. The disenchanted there have transformed May Day
into their own
holiday of dissent, often dissent for dissent purposes. It is Protest
Day for them that accomplishes nothing but dividing the nations where
the protests are held. Many of them don't know what they are
protesting, most are uninformed about the issues they protest, but all
of them seem to love being a trendy protester who will change the
nation to
their often bizarre vision of what they see as a just one.
The liberal areas of this country are where the protests are largest and most violent. The left never protests without creating a scene, a tantrum and sometimes a violent one. It's their way of getting attention for their cause, given that the cause is usually so stupid and off that the only way anyone not a lunatic would notice is by a massive street protest that shuts down a part of the city.
The one in Portland today turned violent when "anarchists" allegedly not associated with the protest threw Molotov cocktails, stones, broke store front windows of businesses and burned a police car. After the protest was shut down by police the leftist protest leader reacted as any 5 year old would (That is often the mentality) by blaming the chaos on "outside agitators", but he also said the anarchists were really right in seeking "justice'. A left wing protest always seems to have professional anarchist protesters attached to the protest march. They dress in all black, usually in in Ninja outfits, wear masks to cover their identity to make it harder for police surveillance cameras to identify them when they turn violent, carry bats or other weapons and smash as many store windows and cars as they can.
I am not sure what they protest because people from the far left protest everything these days. It seems to be a way for some people to have fun an feel "revolutionary" at the same time. My guess the May Day protest were a "I hate Trump let's impeach him" protest, because it's is the year of hate protest against Donald Trump. Protesters rarely approve of democratic elections when their candidate loses. Instead, they demand a recount, say the election was rigged and finally, when their complaints are so baseless that they are ignored, they seek to have the winner removed any way possible and replaced with the leftist that lost or the next best leftist because...well..the left is smugly certain their way is the only way and that they know the best way to govern. Democracy be damned!
Elsewhere in many other liberal cities in the U.S. and dozens of smaller communities, the protesters marched for immigrants (illegal immigrants), for workers (because many of the protesters don't work themselves, preferring to let the tax paying workers they claim to represent, pay for their ":free stuff"), for women and for the rest of the amorphous crowd that leftists claim to represent. Instead of the May Day celebration in civilized countries that is a day traditionally reserved for the cause of laborers around the world., these clowns protest their gripe of the day.
I think May Day here is the ultimate useless protest day. The protesters march and curse the system that allows them to protest because protesting here has become an end in itself. Everyone know those protests are meaningless, that it's a waste of time and it's an inconvenience to people caught in the middle of the protest mayhem. But when you have nothing constructive to do, protest. It's trendy, fun and you get to pretend you are better than everyone else.
How sad it is to impugn real protest with that garbage. The victim at May Day is the legitimate protester who has real causes that society would benefit from hearing, but who is lost in the mindless mass protests of the leftist protester. We should protest that.
The liberal areas of this country are where the protests are largest and most violent. The left never protests without creating a scene, a tantrum and sometimes a violent one. It's their way of getting attention for their cause, given that the cause is usually so stupid and off that the only way anyone not a lunatic would notice is by a massive street protest that shuts down a part of the city.
The one in Portland today turned violent when "anarchists" allegedly not associated with the protest threw Molotov cocktails, stones, broke store front windows of businesses and burned a police car. After the protest was shut down by police the leftist protest leader reacted as any 5 year old would (That is often the mentality) by blaming the chaos on "outside agitators", but he also said the anarchists were really right in seeking "justice'. A left wing protest always seems to have professional anarchist protesters attached to the protest march. They dress in all black, usually in in Ninja outfits, wear masks to cover their identity to make it harder for police surveillance cameras to identify them when they turn violent, carry bats or other weapons and smash as many store windows and cars as they can.
I am not sure what they protest because people from the far left protest everything these days. It seems to be a way for some people to have fun an feel "revolutionary" at the same time. My guess the May Day protest were a "I hate Trump let's impeach him" protest, because it's is the year of hate protest against Donald Trump. Protesters rarely approve of democratic elections when their candidate loses. Instead, they demand a recount, say the election was rigged and finally, when their complaints are so baseless that they are ignored, they seek to have the winner removed any way possible and replaced with the leftist that lost or the next best leftist because...well..the left is smugly certain their way is the only way and that they know the best way to govern. Democracy be damned!
Elsewhere in many other liberal cities in the U.S. and dozens of smaller communities, the protesters marched for immigrants (illegal immigrants), for workers (because many of the protesters don't work themselves, preferring to let the tax paying workers they claim to represent, pay for their ":free stuff"), for women and for the rest of the amorphous crowd that leftists claim to represent. Instead of the May Day celebration in civilized countries that is a day traditionally reserved for the cause of laborers around the world., these clowns protest their gripe of the day.
I think May Day here is the ultimate useless protest day. The protesters march and curse the system that allows them to protest because protesting here has become an end in itself. Everyone know those protests are meaningless, that it's a waste of time and it's an inconvenience to people caught in the middle of the protest mayhem. But when you have nothing constructive to do, protest. It's trendy, fun and you get to pretend you are better than everyone else.
How sad it is to impugn real protest with that garbage. The victim at May Day is the legitimate protester who has real causes that society would benefit from hearing, but who is lost in the mindless mass protests of the leftist protester. We should protest that.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)