Twitter is now more than eight years old. I'm
not excited, given
I don't use cell phones and never have nor will I ever "tweet". I think
language is best used when used with precision, and twitter is , if
anything, not precise. I read every day about miscommunications, often
by celebrities, who claim their tweets were taken "out of context". Ha!
How can that be when twitter, by its very nature is so brief and lax
that no context is possible? If those celebrities want to be taken in
context they might lean how to use the language well enough to speak
and write it more precisely than tweets allow.
I am certainly no expert on tweeting..is that what they call it? But
it does seem to me that Tweeter is better suited for children than
adults. It's just not a serious forum. Yet, in our age of electronic
media fascination and addiction it is used as a formal language
communication. How odd. I think if I ever used Twitter I would do so
with a statement before hand, something like this. "Anything written
here is to be taken non literally. Serious communication will be found
elsewhere. I am not responsible for anything tweeted here, as tweeting
is but a mindless diversion and time killer."
It's interesting what people think they can discuss or reveal in 140
characters, often spelled as if by outer spaces aliens and
grammatically a mystery. Linguist Noam Chomsky finds the whole thing
appalling, calling it "very shallow communication". Further, he
believes what I do, saying that "It requires a very brief, concise form
of thought and so on that tends toward superficiality and draws people
away from real serious communication … It is not a medium of a serious
interchange."
There is a place for not serious communication, and that is a healthy
enterprise. The problem is that Twitter, Face book and the endless
other trivial communication platforms are being used as if serious
ones. Hmmmm I suppose more than a few Twitter addicts have posted
things like, "My husband died 10 minutes ago" or some such news that
clearly is better announced elsewhere and with more sensitivity. But
then, so many people today are engaged in the triviality communications
that they might find that kind of tweet to be "normal". After all, we
live in the time in which humans have a difficult time distinguishing
the real world from the pretend one.
I am not sure if the silly slang and abbreviations are eroding the
English language, or just making it less attractive to communicate in a
more precise way. It might not matter much because it's an accepted
language tool today that we language purists can not stop. I wonder and
ask you.....is Twitter a reflection of evolving language or one that
language is deteriorating?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment