The Mid East Refugee Invasion Of Western Europe

That refugee problem that Western Europe is dealing with, the one in which millions of "refugees" the Mid East are swarming into Western Europe,  is not surprising. Many of those "refugees" are not really threatened from the militants in Iraq. Instead, some are people who are away from the trouble but see an opportunity to get out of the dismal circumstances of the area and settle in "rich' countries that will provide benefits to care for them. There have been many reports that some of the refugees are from places like Pakistan, not sub Saharan Africa, Iraq, Syria etc.

In one way I enjoy seeing the sanctimonious Europeans, who have lectured the United States for 50 years that we should keep open our birders and allow the massive illegal immigration from Mexico and central America into the United States to continue, suffer the same illegal immigration fate as we have. They never once suggested they themselves should take some of our (about 50 million in the past 50 years) illegals. Yet, they now ask the U.S. to take in many of the current Mid East refugees. How hypocritical!

I think the solution should be to help keep the refugees safe, but do so in a Mid Eastern nation or nations, perhaps Turkey. Temporary accommodations could be provided there by the world, under the United Nations' supervision. There is no need for millions of refugees to be resettled into Western Europe where they will be faced with a different language, culture, and religious bent.  Temporary resettlement in the Mid East can eventually led to the refugees returning to their homes after the crises there have ended. But no nation in the Mid East, not Saudi Arabia, for instance, has taken in a single refugee. That is shameful.

As Europe absorbs more and more of those refugees it will eventually see their number rise to a level at which the refugees will demand to have their former Mid East way of life become the norm. There will be a cultural clash that many in Europe will resist and the result will be much unrest, particularly in the form of an increase in the rise of local Islamic terrorist groups in Europe.

Thus, a new problem will have been created by the poor handling of the original one ( the refugee invasion)

Go Topless Day

I just found out there is a 'Go Topless Day' each year at the end of August. Wow! I missed seeing it. This could be a male dream come true sight, uh, if it's a female only topless display. We men have been going topless forever and no one ever objects (Well, when out fat gut and huge breasts show it is a little disgusting.....but it's still legal for the males out there to to show that). Why is it society reacts in shock and outrage, even passing laws claiming the sight of a female breast is obscene? Yet, the same people shocked by the female breast don't even notice male breasts.

GoTopless Day always falls at the Sunday closest to Women's Equality Day, Aug. 26. I think that might be intentional in this age of the so-called war on women. Women in the U.S. seem to complain allot about not being "equal", yet there is little evidence of it. However, they surely are treated unequally in the area of breast displays.  The right to go topless for women is based on gender equality. It is unfair.  But I know of few men who do not support the female right to show her breasts in public, so what are the people against showing female breasts complaining about?

Supposedly, on Go Topless Day, people in cities around the world are invited to stand up (and jiggle?) for a women's right to go topless in public. Both men and women parade topless, making it hard for any female to be arrested for public nudity, given the guys are showing their breasts too. Hmmm Looking at a boob map for Go Topless Day I see no rallies in my Oregon, but quite a few internationally. It seems that breasts are being barred in many places in the world on Go Topless Day. Oh my....I see that New York City has a 'Nipple Pride" parade on that day. I wonder why anyone would take pride in his or her nipples. Is the look of a nipple not an act of nature, not the individual? Should we take pride or fell ashamed because nature gave us or gave us not nice breasts?

I see also that in some of the parades while the display female breasts, the males cover theirs with bras. It's supposed to be symbolic of the female search for "equal treatment". But I wonder if bras for the ladies are more a demand of nature than for public decency. Men and women are treated differently in some areas, to the advantage of men in some cases and of women in others, based on conditions nature gives us. It's a life is unfair thing. Women could protest, for example, that they have to be the ones getting pregnant, but it won't change the fact that nature is the one who "discriminates" in that regard.

I say that women shouldn't be persecuted for doing something men have done for decades without any problems. So on Go Topless day break the bonds of slavery and show us your breasts. ladies!